Communication, Media, and Development Policy

Analysis, Ideas and Debates on Development Policy Issues from Communication and Media Perspectives

Comments and Questions Related to Re-vamping UNICEF’s Africa Communication for Development Strategy




Revamping UNICEF C4D Strategy by Neil Ford

Neil Ford suggests re-vamping UNICEF’s Africa Communication for Development Strategy in order to improve impact and achieve results. He suggests two strategic changes: (1) to focus on only few broad communication methodologies and (2) to focus on partnership development at the community level. Both suggestions are logically correct, however when Neil is telling us what to do, he is not telling us how to do it. Historically, there were several attempts in UNICEF to go to scale in communication, but only few attempts included sustainability mechanisms.
One of those attempts was undertaken in Nigeria (1986-89), which is mentioned by Neil as a current example of disperse application of communication strategies. I happened to be a UNICEF Chief Communication Section in Nigeria in that time. We focused on only two strategies: (1) capacity building within the mass media (NTA and FRCN). So called Child Survival Secretariat at NTA, entirely equipped by UNICEF and staffed by UNICEF trained personnel was producing from its inception and broadcasting something like an hour a week of Child Survival oriented programs. This technically correct approach died progressively due to lack of sustainability (rapid use of equipment, desertion of trained staff to better professional opportunities, gradual erosion of political will including UNICEF, etc)
(2) the second strategy consisted on organizing campaigns, mainly immunization campaigns, where UNICEF was mobilizing one-time participation of social groups (Rotary, civil society organizations, traditional leaders and others), making radio messages in 86 different languages, etc…. and –‘beating the bush’ as described by then Minister of Health Olikoye Ransome-Kuti. All resources were consumed in the process.
Nobody evaluated comparatively those two approaches in Nigeria. Logically speaking the first one was more promising at the long run, however lacked sustainability. The second approach, very common in Latin America at that time, was frustrating by its need to repeat it again and again. What was better? Both were good. Personally I believe there are several good communication strategies, which success depend on sustained, consequent use and application.
Best regards, Stas Czaplicki, former UNICEF staff member


Reply

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.


The CI with

Comments on Blogs



Add our RSS feed

Recent Posts


Add our RSS feed

Social Climate Change 
Nobel Intentions 
Northern Lights 
Government Rules! 
Show me the Media Money - but what should we do with it? 
Little Green People 
Whose Policy is it Anyway? 
Can we put a value on the good that media do? A social cost approach to media development 
Percussive Effects 
A gutsy new DFID White Paper puts the politics back into development 
The commonalities lens sees AIDS better 
Battle Star Development: Prescriptions vs. Platforms 
Trading Rights 
Another Development 
Scaling Steep Slopes - The Public Policies Helping to Transform Medellin 
Accountability, media and the development system: a complicated romance 
People, Ideas and Things 
Donors, Governance and Media Aid: Some Thoughts from Sierra Leone  
ChangeNet: The Lessons from Obama's campaign for International Development Democracy and Governance Policy and Action 
Cable News 
Democratic Adjustment? 
Should international development NGOs play a major role in media for development? 
A Robust Research Agenda on Media and Democracy in Fragile States: Getting a More Serious Conversation Going 
Governance and the Media: the engagement gap 
A "democratic recession" presents challenges - and opportunities 
The TransAtlantic Taskforce on Development: great report, but where is the development and democracy debate headed? 
Development Street - no Wall? 
Media and democracy in fragile states: the promises and problems of policy relevant research  
Deportation of Rex Gardner is a Weak Attempt to Intimidate Fiji Media 
The media debate in the UK is unique - but the challenge of subsidising independent public interest media has urgent implications for democracy everywhere 
The Athenian Way!...or should that be "Why?" 
Winds of Change - Media Development Trends and Questions 
The Fairness Doctrine: is this the first big media debate under Obama and what does it mean for media development? 
Disaster-affected communities are and should be the architects of their own recovery, not merely passive recipients of international goodwill 
OBAMA, DEVELOPMENT, AID, and GRANDMOTHERS! 
Is a free and plural media more important than elections in securing democratic development? 
Media Development or Media for Development?: wrong question - but what’s the right one?  
A Rose by Any Other Name is Still a...the basis for one coherent Communication and Media Development field of work  
Accra: The big tent approach to development ends in agreement – and information is one of the big winners 
Where the European Union meets the African Union on media development 
Community Radio Initiators Ready to Run the Stations Soon in Bangladesh 
Re-vamping UNICEF’s Africa Communication for Development Strategy 
Accra Aid Effectiveness conference: can there be real “country ownership” without public debate? 
Big Investors - The Vacant Low Level Seat at the Accra High Level Development Effectiveness Summit 
Kenya Political Violence - Were Media Responsible? 
Tides of Hope? 
Miming Development: The Shortest Distance and International Development 
Over the Edge! 
Power of Movement 
Science Envy?: A Communication Perspective on the Core Principles that Guide International Development Interventions 
Talk with the People! 
AIDS Lines 
I Blame Smallpox 
I Had [I Think] A Dream 
Little Big Communication 

Your Recent Posts