Does it Matter That We Don't Agree on the Definition of Poverty? A Comparison of Four Approaches
Author
Caterina Ruggeri Laderchi
Ruhi Saith
Frances Stewart
Publication Date
May 15, 2003
Summary
ABSTRACT:
While there is worldwide agreement on poverty reduction as an overriding goal of development policy, there is little agreement on the definition of poverty. The paper reviews four approaches to the definition and measurement of poverty - the monetary, capability, social exclusion and participatory approaches. It points out the theoretical underpinnings of the various measures, and problems of operationalising them. It argues that each is a construction of reality, involving numerous judgements, which are often not transparent. The different methods have different implications for policy, and also, to the extent that they point to different people as being poor, for targeting.
Empirical work in Peru and India shows that there is significant lack of overlap between the methods with, for example, nearly half the population identified as in poverty according to monetary poverty not in capability poverty, and conversely. This confirms similar findings elsewhere. Hence the definition of poverty does matter for poverty eradication strategies.
Publisher
Number of Pages
Placed on the Communication Initiative site June 23 2003
Last Updated June 25 2009
How useful did you find the knowledge and contacts on this page to your work?
Post your comments (review comments from others below):
COMMENTS POSTED